Just when we were getting accustomed to the new names in Hollywood, it seems like there’s a whole lot more. It makes sense for actors and actresses choosing their stage name after achieving fame (or notoriety) but what about regular people?
The “the impact of names” is a term that has been used to describe the effect that people’s names can have on their lives. The article discusses how some people are able to change their name, while others cannot.
Hollywood is a difficult industry to get into. Getting your name out there is a difficult task. You essentially have to go out of your way to promote yourself in whatever capacity you are strong at in order to achieve it. This isn’t just about actors; it’s also about directors, writers, and cinematographers; everyone needs to do it, and there’s no better way for filmmakers to get their name out there than by actually creating a picture and putting it out there. When you’re in the middle of this process, it becomes clear that creating movies is difficult. When it comes to filming a film, there are so many variables to consider that if even one of them fails to achieve the required criteria, the whole project is doomed. Dangerous, a new Scott Eastwood film that will be available for streaming this week, seems to be one of those self-promotional pictures. Is it able to achieve its objectives?
Scott Eastwood, Mel Gibson, Tyrese Gibson, Kevin Durand, and Famke Janssen feature in David Hackl’s Dangerous. The film follows Dylan Forrester, a recovered psychopath with violent inclinations who has gone through a difficult period in his life. Dylan resolves to attend his brother’s funeral when he dies, but his violent history follows him, putting a whole group of people he cares about in peril.
Scott Eastwood has spent a significant amount of time in Hollywood. Being the son of Clint Eastwood, a living icon, has its advantages, but it also has its drawbacks. Scott may inherit his father’s good looks, but he lacks the charm that propelled his father to stardom. As a result, Scott has worked very hard to establish himself as a performer and director in his own right. Scott produced this picture, which serves as a resume for him as both an actor and a producer. Unfortunately, the film’s production quality screams low-budget at every turn, and the consequence is a picture that seems outmoded and uninteresting in practically every way.
David Hackl isn’t the most technically savvy of filmmakers. Since the sixth movie of the Saw series, his career has consisted only of low-budget direct-to-video material. To be honest, some of such films may be entertaining if the filmmakers are sincere about creating a decent film despite their limited means. Dangerous is an odd entity in this regard, since he has a distinct lack of eyesight. The sense of direction is almost non-existent. Hackl has little sense of composition and seems to be content with discovering the film in the editing room. Which is a shame since the film offers lots of chances to create something unique for the direct-to-video market.
Dangerous is essentially a Die Hard-style film, with Eastwood’s psychotic character trapped in a single area with a slew of bad people. This has the potential for some fantastic action moments and the utilization of the setting as a character in its own right, but Hackl never takes use of it.
To make the picture more glossy, Eastwood brings in a few of well-known actors. Mel Gibson pops up now and again, and the actor still exudes the same charm that made him a success so long ago. However, his role in the film is essentially that of a cameo. Tyrese is the same way, as he arrives briefly and then vanishes from the movie. Even when her character is more immersed in the tale, Janssen maintains the same level of commitment.
The majority of the movie is split between Eastwood and a group of unknown performers who try their best with the material. Unfortunately, the writing isn’t very good, and much of the language, storyline, and character development seem forced and familiar to anybody who has ever seen an action movie. Only Destiny Millns, who exudes a lot of charisma, comes off as a pleasant person. In the future, I’d want to see her achieve greater and better things.
The action, for an action picture, lacks any feeling of impact. We now live in the aftermath of The Raid. When it comes to getting into the genre, remembering that The Raid was made on a shoestring budget and yet managed to become a contemporary masterpiece must be on every filmmaker’s mind. It’s evident that the performers in Dangerous are untrained, and action choreography was thrown in as an afterthought. When there are so many other fantastic movies out there putting the effort into generating amazing action at a cost, it makes the movie appear tacky and even a waste of time.
Eastwood believed that although dangerous may not be the ticket, it might be. He’s not a horrible actor, but performances like this one risk cementing his image as a second-rate imitation of his father. And it would be a pity if Scott Eastwood’s efforts amounted to little more. He’s capable of so much more.
4 out of 10
The “psychological effects of changing a child’s name” is something that most parents are faced with. It can be difficult to decide if the change will have any impact on the child, but it is important to know that there are many factors that come into play when considering this decision.
Related Tags
- the psychology of names
- what is the impact of your name in your life
- is it good to have a unique name
- why are names important in society
- why your name matters
